CAHP 2026 Catch us at the CAHP Annual Conference, Oct 19–21 in Palm Desert. Gabeo is a proud Gold sponsor. See the conference

~$1.13M in recovered and identified value.

Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center partnered with gabeo.ai on a 90-day pilot of ZOE beginning September 2025. A forensic re-audit of zero-balance, payer-denied accounts produced a $6.89M write-off dataset and two action areas: claim-level appeal workflows, and potential contract breach denials flagged for payer escalation.

No integration required to start Zero IT lift >16X ROI
Appeals Successfully Recovered
$377K
recovered in cash to date
Appeals workflow · RCM
$243.3K via claim-level appeals plus $133.3K reprocessed by Aetna after escalation.
+
Provider Contract Breach
$750K
generated yearly
Escalation workflow · Contract enforcement
2,016 flagged denials escalated; Aetna corrected its adjudication prospectively.
=
$1.13M
total value created
Appeals cash + yearly value from the Aetna correction
>16X
gross ROI
On a $22,500 fixed-fee pilot
Pilot PeriodSep to Dec 2025 · payment tail through Apr 2026
Engagement90-Day Pilot · $7,500 / month · fixed fee
PlatformZOE · Write-Off Recovery
Total Value Created
$1.13M
Appeals cash + yearly value from the Aetna correction
Appeals Recovered
$377K
Cash posted, reconciled to 835 remits
Provider Contract Breach
$750K
Client-validated yearly run-rate
ROI
>16X
Gross · 15.7X net of fee
Sarah Bush Lincoln
Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center
Not-for-profit regional hospital · Mattoon, Illinois
Beds145
Net Patient Revenue~$1B
EHROracle Health (Cerner)
01 The Opportunity

A $6.89M write-off dataset. Two paths to recovery.

ZOE re-audited SBLHC's zero-balance, payer-denied accounts against contract terms, payer reimbursement policies, and historical adjudication behavior, isolating a write-off dataset of 7,479 claims totaling $6.89M in billed charges. Triage routed the dataset three ways: 3,066 claims ($4.13M) to claim-level appeals, 2,016 claims ($1.2M) flagged as potential contract breach denials for payer escalation, and 2,397 claims ($1.56M) deprioritized where balances fell below the cost to appeal or appeal rights were exhausted.

Path 1 · Appeals Workflow
$377K
3,066 claims appealed ($4.13M billed) · cash posted
Path 2 · Contract Breach Escalation
~$750K
2,016 claims escalated · client-validated yearly value
From Write-Off Dataset to Cash
Log scale · appeals workflow
02 Action Area 1 · Appeals Workflow

From $0 to $377K in cash. 58% overturn rate on decided appeals.

All 3,066 appeal packets ($4.13M in billed charges) were filed within the 90-day pilot; payer decisions and cash posting continued through April 2026. To date, 1,414 claims have paid: a 58% overturn rate on the 2,450 decided (46% of all filed), with 616 still pending payer determination. Gabeo handled the full workflow, from root-cause audit to appeal drafting with contract and policy citations, submission, and follow-up; SBLHC's role was limited to authorizing recommended actions.

Appeal Packets Filed
3,066
$4.13M billed · all filed within the pilot
Claims Paid
1,414
58% of decided · peak cohort 83% (Nov 25)
Submission to Cash
9.3days
Post-integration (Apr 2026) vs 60-day pilot average
Monthly Recovery Trend
Cash by posting month · bars sum to $376.6K
Avg Days from Submission to Posted Cash
ZOE post-denial EHR integration live Apr 14, 2026
It gets faster and better over time
As SBLHC transitioned toward the MSA, ZOE's post-denial EHR integration went live on April 14, 2026. First-month results: a 72% overturn rate on decided appeals and 9.3 days average from submission to posted cash, versus the 60-day pilot average (fastest: 2 days). Top payer: Aetna, with $301.8K posted across appeals and reprocessing.
How we count
Overturn rates use decided appeals as the denominator (paid ÷ paid-plus-upheld) unless stated otherwise. Payments post at contracted allowed amounts, not billed charges; on paid claims in this cohort, posted cash averaged 23% of billed. All cash figures are reconciled to 835 remits; monthly bars show cash by posting month and sum to the $376.6K total.
View payer and denial-category detail Hide detail
Payer Performance
PayerCharges BilledCash Posted
Aetna · appeals$1,976,907$168,542
Aetna · reprocessingIncluded above$133,300
UHC Insurance Co.$521,889$32,656
UHC Medicare Advantage$742,119$16,322
Meridian Complete$90,454$9,218
UHC Complete Care$518,713$8,098
Meridian Health Plan$141,979$7,230
BCBS of Illinois$107,126$0*
Other$26,556$1,234
Total$4,125,743$376,600
*BCBS of Illinois appeal rights were exhausted under the plan's filing-limit policy; pursuit closed after first-level review.
Denial Category Performance
Denial CategoryClaimsPaidCash PostedPaid ÷ Filed
Timely Filing (incl. TFL)2,4541,287$195,40252.4%
Authorization6125$34,22841.0%
Coding Error524102$13,65119.5%
Other270$190.0%
Total3,0661,414$243,30046.1%
Appeals channel only; excludes the $133.3K in Aetna-reprocessed claims. This view uses paid ÷ filed (616 appeals remain pending), so rates read lower than the decided-only overturn rate.
03 Action Area 2 · Contract Breach Escalation

A second engine of value: $750K from potential contract breach denials.

ZOE's audit flagged 2,016 Aetna commercial claims, implicating $1.2M in billed charges, where timely-filing denials conflicted with the filing-limit terms of SBLHC's provider agreement. Gabeo pre-matched every claim to the contract provision at issue and packaged the set for payer escalation, so SBLHC acted with claim-level evidence in hand instead of researching account by account. The resolution had two parts: Aetna reprocessed the historical claims ($133.3K posted to date) and corrected its timely-filing adjudication prospectively, a client-validated ~$750K per year in avoided write-offs.

Claims Flagged
2,016
Potential contract breach denials · Aetna commercial
Write-Offs Implicated
$1.2M
Billed charges · timely-filing denials vs contract terms
How escalation differs from appeals Hide explanation
Appeals ask the payer to reconsider
An appeal works within the payer's own review process: resubmit the claim with evidence and wait for a decision. It is the right tool when a denial contradicts the payer's published policy.
Escalation enforces the contract
When denials appear to violate the provider agreement itself, the remedy is escalation under the contract's dispute provisions, outside the payer's routine appeal discretion.
Gabeo does the forensic work
Every claim pre-matched to the specific contract term at issue and packaged for bulk action. SBLHC acted on a ready case file rather than researching 2,016 claims individually.
How to read the $750K
A client-validated run-rate: SBLHC revenue cycle leadership confirmed, against its own 835 remittance data, that Aetna's corrected timely-filing adjudication avoids roughly $750K per year in write-offs going forward. It is prospective value, not pilot cash, and is combined with the $377K only in the $1.13M total, with that distinction stated. The $133.3K in reprocessed historical claims is counted once, in the appeals cash figure.
04 Economics

>16X ROI on a fixed $22,500 fee.

Flat fee, no contingency, no percentage of recovery, no clawback risk. Every dollar recovered was already booked as a loss; it is pure incremental revenue.

Total Engagement Fee
$22,500
$7,500 / month × 3 · fixed
FTE Savings
2 FTEs
~$110K/yr avoided · not in pilot ROI, considered for the MSA
Financial Summary
MetricActual (cash)
Gross appeals recovery$376,600
Engagement fee($22,500)
Net to hospital$354,100
Gross ROI (cash ÷ fee)16.7X
Net ROI (net ÷ fee)15.7X
Why this is defensible
The ROI is computed from cash posted and reconciled to 835 remits ($376,600) against the fixed $22,500 fee: 16.7X gross, 15.7X net of the fee. No projected or expected figures are included; the ">16X" headline refers to the gross figure.
The yearly value is on top
The ~$750K per year from Aetna's corrected timely-filing adjudication is not included in this ROI. It is additional, client-validated prospective value generated by the same engagement.
FTE savings
Replicating this output internally would take an estimated 2 dedicated FTEs (~$110K per year, fully loaded). This saving is excluded from the pilot ROI and is considered in the 3-year MSA economics.
05 The Outcome

SBLHC is moving forward: a 3-year MSA and full integration.

The pilot results were presented to SBLHC leadership. On the strength of both workstreams, SBLHC is now moving forward with a 3-year master services agreement and direct integration, which will yield even better results: faster turnaround, higher win rates, and recovery running continuously instead of in batches.

"
"ZOE went after claims we had already written off and turned them into posted cash, without adding a single FTE to my team. The contract findings on Aetna alone changed how we think about our write-offs."
DH
Dan Holste
Managed Care & Denials Director, Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center

What's hiding in your write-offs?

Most health systems are sitting on millions in claims they've already accepted as lost. We'll show you what's recoverable in a 90-day pilot: no integration, no additional headcount.

Sales contact
Kamryn Corley
Head of Sales & Partnerships
kamryn@gabeo.ai
Pilot model
90-day pilot · Contingency based · Risk-Free · No IT Lift · No EHR Integration
What we need
24 months of EDI 837 / 835
Write-off Report
Provider Contracts